🔗 Share this article

A digital rights organization has stated to have scraped a vast number of tracks from the popular streaming service and is preparing to publish them online.

Potential Boost for Artificial Intelligence Development

Industry experts noted the seeming data breach could boost artificial intelligence firms looking for material to develop their technology.

A group called Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million rows of associated data such as performer and album names. The company, which carries more than 100 million tracks, confirmed that the breach did not represent its full inventory.

“We have located and disabled the nefarious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” stated a company representative.

The Swedish service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorized access found a external actor collected public metadata and employed questionable methods to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Declared Goal and Concerns

Spotify does not think the music taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group asserted the music files represented 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘torrents’, a means of sharing large data files online.

“Of course Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and culture”.

Model Development and Copyright Battleground

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ copyright, said the breached music would likely be utilized for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on pirated material is sadly common in the tech sector, so this stolen music is almost certain to end up instructing AI models,” he stated.

The group's website makes references to a large online archive, a vast online archive of copyrighted books that has allegedly been used by Meta to develop its AI models.

A founder of an AI startup wrote on the professional network that members of the public could in theory “build their own private free equivalent of the service”. He said it could also allow technology firms to “train on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has become a battleground between artists, authors and creatives on one side and tech giants on the other.

Policy Considerations and Reactions

In the UK, creative professionals have protested against a government proposal to allow AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without consent unless the rights holder signals. Almost every respondent to a government consultation on the proposal has backed artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for science, research and technology told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this right”. The administration has pledged to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by next year.