🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and parents are observing intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing number of countries are exploring similar restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that smartphones and networks are "robbing our kids' childhood". A law may be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to verify the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential options under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on parliament to enact a proposal raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a related move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended families to block their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory motion demanding a ban for minors without guardian approval is given. Although it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these services, the resolution does not create binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a good starting point," stated one European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "supported by strong research".

Earlier, support gathered behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the government vowed to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have voiced concerns. An organization established by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous social media material suggests that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for young users," commented a prominent peer.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, legislation is largely occurring at the state government level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law capping minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional time needing a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed laws demanding adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from various figures to mimic the Australian example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Outside of Europe and the US, other nations are also considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, global organizations strike a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "could backfire". The body points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for marginalized children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

While this global debate evolves, the policies of this nation and its followers show that policymakers globally are less and less content to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.